Charity? -- Here is my two cents on "alternative facts". I suspect Conway simply meant to say that Todd (i.e. the journalist she was talking to) was referring to one subset of the facts (how the Mall looked like at time t), and she (and Spicer) were referring to another -- "alternative" -- subset of the facts (how the Mall looked like at time t'). Of course, she and Spicer were wrong (indeed very probably lying!) about how the Mall looked at t'. -- I am not sure whether my suggestion is a charitable one. For what is worse (in the eyes of my fellow philosophers): being a liar or being a metaphysical relativist?